Las metrópolis del siglo XXI Nuevas geografías de la teoría
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v10i22.271Palabras clave:
Nuevas geografías, futuros urbanos, teoría urbana, urbanización, urbanismo, ciudades del tercer mundoResumen
Este artículo aboga por “nuevas geografías” de la imaginación y de la epistemología en la producción de las teorías urbana y regional. Postula que las teorizaciones dominantes de las ciudades-región globales tienen sus raíces en la experiencia euroamericana, y por tanto no son capaces de analizar las múltiples formas de las modernidades metropolitanas. Con base en la experiencia urbana del Sur global, este artículo presenta nuevos vectores conceptuales para la comprensión de la mundialización de las ciudades, la producción del espacio y las dinámicas de exurbanidad. Se argumenta que tales “conocimientos de áreas” incrementan los recientes esfuerzos teóricos para articular un estudio relacional del espacio y del lugar.
Descargas
Citas
Abbas, A. (2000), “Cosmopolitan De-scriptions: Shanghai and Hong Kong”, Public Culture 12, pp. 769-786.
Alsayyad, N. y A. Roy (2003), “Prologue/Dialogue”, en A. Roy y N.
Alsayyad (eds.), Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, South Asia, and Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Amin, A. (2004), “Regions Unbound: Towards a New Politics of Place”, Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 86, pp. 33-44.
Appadurai, A. (1996), Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
_____ (2000a), “Grassroots Globalization and Research Imagination”, Public Culture 12, pp. 1-19.
_____ (2000b), “Spectral Housing and Urban Cleansing: Notes on Millennial Mumbai”, Public Culture 12, pp. 627-651.
_____ (2002), “Deep Democracy: Urban Governmentality and the Horizon of Politics”, Public Culture 14, pp. 21-47.
Auyero, J. (2000), “The Hyper-Shantytown: Neoliberal Violence(s) in the Argentine Slum”, Ethnography 1, pp. 93-116.
Baudrillard, J. (1986), America. New York, NY: Verso.
Bayat, A. (2000), “From ‘Dangerous Classes’ to ‘Quiet Rebels’: the Politics of the Urban Subaltern in the Global South”, International Sociology 15, pp. 533-557.
Berman, M. (1982), All That Is Solid Melts Into Air. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Brenner, N. (2004), New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Brenner, N. y N. Theodore (2002), “Cities and the Geographies of ‘Actually Existing Neoliberalism”, Antipode 34, pp. 349-379.
Caldeira, T. (2001), City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in Sao Paulo. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cardoso, F. H. y E. Faletto (1979), Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Castells, M. (1983), The City and the Grassroots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
_____ (1996), The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Chakrabarty, D. (2000), Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chatterjee, P. (2006), The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Constable, N. (1997), Maid to Order in Hong Kong: An Ethnography of Filipina Workers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Davis, M. (1990), City of Quartz: Excavating the Future in Los Angeles. New York, NY: Vintage.
_____ (1999), “Magical Urbanism: How Latinos Reinvent the Big City”, New Left Review 234, pp. 3-43.
_____ (2004), “Planet of Slums: Urban Involution and the Informal Proletariat”, New Left Review 26, pp. 5-34.
_____ (2006), “Fear and Money in Dubai”, New Left Review 41, pp. 47-68.
Davis, M. y D. B. Mork (eds.) (2007), Evil Paradises: Dreamworlds of Neoliberalism. New York, NY: New Press.
De Certeau, M. (1984), The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dear, M. y G. Leclerc (eds.) (2003), Postborder City: Cultural Spaces of Bajalta California. New York, NY: Routledge.
Dutta, A. (2006), The Bureaucracy of Beauty. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ehrenreich, B. y A. Hochschild (eds.) (2003), Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
Frank, A. G. (1967), Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America.New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Gaonkar, D. P. (ed.) (2001), Alternative Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Gillem, M. (2004), America Town: Building the Outposts of Empire. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Department of Architecture. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley.
Graham, S. (ed.) (2004), Cities, War, and Terrorism: Towards an Urban Geopolitics. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Graham, S. y S. Marvin (2001), Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities, and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
Harvey, D. (1989), The Urban Experience. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
_____ (1990), The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.
_____ (2005), The New Imperialism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Holston, J. (ed.) (1999), Cities and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
_____ (2001), “Urban Citizenship and Globalization”, en A. J. Scott (ed.), Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 325-347.
Isin, E. F. (2001), “Istanbul’s Conflicting Paths to Citizenship: Islamization and Globalization”, en A. J. Scott (ed.), Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 349-370.
Jacobs, J. (1996), Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the City. New York, NY: Routledge.
Jarvis, H. (2007), “Home Truths About Care-less Competitiveness”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31, pp. 207-214.
Jessop, B. (1994), “Post-Fordism and the State”, en A. Amin (ed.), Post-Fordism: A Reader. Blackwell, Cambridge, pp. 251-279.
Jonas, A. y K. Ward (2007), “Introduction to a Debate on City-regions: New Geographies of Governance, Democracy and Social Reproduction”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31, pp. 169-178.
Knox, P. y P. Taylor (1995), “World Cities in a World-System”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Laquian, A. (2005), Beyond Metropolis: The Planning and Governance of Asia’s Mega Urban Regions. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lee, L. (2001), “Shanghai Modern: Reflections on Urban Culture in China in the 1930s”, en D. P. Gaonkar (ed.), Alternative Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 86-122.
Mbembe, A. (2004), “Aesthetics of Superfluity”, Public Culture 16, pp. 373-405.
Mbembe, A. y S. Nuttall (2004), “Writing the World from an African Metropolis”, Public Culture 16, pp. 347-372.
Mbembe, A. y J. Roitman (2003), “The Figure of the Subject in the Time of Crisis”, en M. Abdoul (ed.), Under Siege: Four African Cities. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz, pp. 99-126.
Mitchell, K. (2004), Crossing the Neoliberal Line: Pacific Rim Migration and the Metropolis. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Mitchell, T. (ed.) (2000), Questions of Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Newman, D. (1996), “The Territorial Politics of Exurbanization”, Israeli Affairs 3, 61-85.
Nuttall, S. y A. Mbembe (2005), “A Blase‘ Attitude: a Response to Michael Watts”, Public Culture 17, 193-201.
Olds, K. (2001a), Globalization and Urban Change: Capital, Culture and Pacific Rim Mega-Projects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____ (2001b), “Practices for ‘Process Geographies’: a View from Within and Outside the Periphery”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 19, pp. 127-136.
Ong, A. (1999), “Flexible Citizenship: The Cultural Logics of Transnationality”. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Perlman, J. (2003), The Reality of Marginality, en A. Roy y N. Alsayyad (eds.), Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, South Asia, and Latin America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press, pp. 105-146.
Portes, A., M. Castells y L. Benton (1989), The Informal Economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Purcell, M. (2007), “City-regions, Neoliberal Globalization and Democracy: a Research Agenda”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31, pp. 197-206.
Rao, V. (2006), “Slum as Theory: the South/Asian City and Globalization”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30, pp. 225-232.
Robinson, J. (2002), “Global and World Cities: a View from Off the Map”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 26, pp. 531-554.
_____ (2003), “Postcolonialising Geography: Tactics and Pitfalls”, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24, pp. 273-289.
_____ (2006), Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.
Roy, A. (2003), City Requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the Politics of Poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Roy, A. y N. Alsayyad (eds.) (2003), Urban Informality: Transnational Perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America, and South Asia. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Sassen, S. (1991), The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Scott, A. J. (ed.) (2001), Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Segal, R. y E. Weizman (eds.) (2003), A Civilian Occupation: The Politics of Israeli Architecture. New York, NY: Verso.
Segbers, K. (2007), The Making of Global City Regions: Johannesburg, Mumbai/Bombay, Sao Paulo, and Shanghai. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Simone, A. (2001), “On the Worlding of African Cities”, African Studies Review 44, pp. 15-41.
_____ (2004a), “People as Infrastructure: Intersecting Fragments in Johannesburg”, Public Culture 16, pp. 407-429.
_____ (2004b), For the City Yet to Come: Changing Life in Four African Cities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
_____ (2006), “Pirate Towns: Reworking Social and Symbolic Infrastructures in Johannesburg and Douala”, Urban Studies 43, pp. 357-370.
Singermann, D. y P. Amar (eds.) (2006), Cairo Cosmopolitan: Politics, Culture, and Urban Space in the New Middle East. El Cairo: AUC Press.
Smith, M. P. (2001), Transnational Urbanism: Locating Globalization. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Smith, N. (1996), The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. New York, NY: Routledge.
_____ (2002), “New Globalism, New Urbanism: Gentrification as Global Urban Strategy”, Antipode 34, pp. 427-450.
Soja, E. (1992), “Inside Exopolis: Scenes from Orange County”, en M. Sorkin (ed.), Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York, NY: Hill & Wang.
Sorkin, M. (ed.) (1992), Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. NewYork, NY: Hill&Wang.
Stren, R. (2001), “Local Governance and Social Diversity in the Developing World: New Challenges for Globalizing City-Regions”, en A. J. Scott (ed.), Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, P. (2000), “World Cities and Territorial States under Conditions of Contemporary Globalization”, Political Geography 19, pp. 5-32.
Watts, M. (2005), “Baudelaire over Berea, Simmel over Sandton?”, Public Culture 17, pp. 181-192.
Yeoh, B., S. Huang y K. Willis (2000), “Global Cities, Transnational Flows, and Gender Dimensions”, Tijidschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie 2, pp. 147-158.
Yiftachel, O. (2006), “Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/ Palestine”. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta revista está bajo una licencia Creative Commons México 2.5. Está permitida la reproducción y difusión de los contenidos de la revista para fines educativos o de investigación, sin ánimo de lucro, siempre y cuando éstos no se mutilen, y se cite la procedencia (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) y al autor. Los derechos patrimoniales de los artículos publicados en Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social son cedidos por el(los) autor(es) a la Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México una vez que los originales han sido aceptados para que se publiquen y distribuyan tanto en la versión impresa como electrónica de la revista. Sin embargo, tal y como lo establece la ley, el(los) autor(es) conserva(n) sus derechos morales. El(los) autor(es) recibirá(n) una forma de cesión de derechos patrimoniales que deberá(n) firmar una vez que su original haya sido aceptado. En el caso de trabajos colectivos bastará la firma de uno de los autores, en el entendido de que éste ha obtenido el consentimiento de los demás. Los autores podrán usar el material de su artículo en otros trabajos o libros publicados por ellos mismos, con la condición de citar a Andamios como la fuente original de los textos.
