Neither Fatalism Nor Voluntarism: Philosophy of Historical Reality

Authors

  • Fernando Andrés Monedero García Complutense University of Madrid image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v21i55.1090

Keywords:

Ellacuría, fatalism, voluntarism, historical reality, real possibility

Abstract

This paper focuses on Ignacio Ellacuría’s Philosophy of Historical Reality and aims to highlight its potential against contemporary fatalistic and voluntaristic positions. Both terms —fatalism and voluntarism— respectively condense two reductive conceptions of History and how it proceeds. Moreover, they have dangerous anthropological, psychosocial, and political implications since they prevent the correct diagnosis and treatment of structural problems. We conclude that it is in the structural integration between the historical and the natural, on the one hand, as well as in the ideas of real possibility and functionality, on the other hand, where we find some conceptual keys to combat fatalism and voluntarism. 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Fernando Andrés Monedero García, Complutense University of Madrid

     

    Investigador adscrito al Departamento de Lógica y Filosofía Teórica en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España.

References

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Neither Fatalism Nor Voluntarism: Philosophy of Historical Reality. (2024). Andamios, Revista De Investigación Social, 21(55), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v21i55.1090