AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL CRITICISM TO LARRY LAUDAN’S SCIENTIFIC METAMETHODOLOGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v4i7.314Keywords:
Metamethodology, objectivity, relativism, justification of knowledge, skepticismAbstract
This paper is intended to (1) outline the metamethodological proposal by Larry Laudan in his book Beyond Positivism and Relativism (1996), which would provide a foundation for the evaluation of scientific methodologies, that warrants —according to the authorobjectivity in sciences and (2) develop a detailed criticism of two theses from this proposal. I suggest these theses are not justified so that a reformulation or radical change would be needed in order for the objectivity of science to be maintained. However, replacing a metamethodology with another could be misleading, since this eludes the fundamental skeptical problem of the justification of knowledge. I will not conclude the end of philosophy in skepticism; nevertheless, my arguments point towards this very overwhelming direction.
Downloads
References
CARNAP, Rudolf (1988), La construcción lógica del mundo. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. [Original en alemán, 1928].
FEYERABEND, Paul (1993), Tratado contra el método. México: Tecnos. [Original en inglés, 1975].
KUHN, Thomas S. (1982), La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica. [Original en inglés 1962; original en inglés con la posdata, 1969.
LAUDAN, Larry (1983), Science and Values. California: University of California Press, 1983.
———— (1996), Beyond Positivism and Relativism, EUA / Reino Unido: Westview Press, 1996.
OLIVÉ, León y Ana Rosa PÉREZ RANSANZ (comps.) (1989), Filosofía de la ciencia: Teoría y observación. México: Siglo XXI / Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
