WHERE IS SOCIAL CITIZENSHIP HEADING? (FROM MARSHALL TO SEN)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v5i9.188Keywords:
Welfare, capacities, social citizenship, Marshall, SenAbstract
The concept of social citizenship, as formulated by Marshall in the middle of the 20th century, is in crisis. Its most evident sign is the impact of the privatization policies iniciated by neoliberal governments in 1980. This paper attempts to open a debate about its future, which is linked to the examination of what we understand as welfare. In Amartya Sen’s work, it is possible to find patterns that allow us to go in this direction and ask if it is time to move from a welfare focused on covering needs to another whose aim would be the creation of capacities.
Downloads
References
BARBALET, J. M. (1988), Citizenship. Rights, Struggle and Class Ine- quality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
BARBER, B. (2000), Un lugar para todos. Cómo fortalecer la democracia y la sociedad civil. Barcelona: Paidós.
BOTTOMORE, T. (1998), “Ciudadanía y Clase Social, Cuarenta Años Después”, en Marshall, T. H. y T. Bottomore (1998), Ciudada- nía y Clase Social. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 85-137.
CROUCH, C. (2003), Commercialisation or Citizenship. Education policy and the future of public services. Londres: The Fabian Society.
-------(2004), Posdemocracia, Madrid: Taurus.
DAHRENDORF, R. (1997), “La naturaleza cambiante de la ciudadanía”, en La Política. Revista de estudios sobre el Estado y la sociedad, núm. 3, pp.139-149.
DWYER, P. (2000), Welfare rights and responsibilities: Contesting social citizenship. Bristol: Policy Press.
-------(2004), Understanding Social Citizenship. Bristol: Policy Press.
GARGARELLA, R. y Ovejero F. (2001), “El socialismo, todavía”. Introducción a Gargarella, R. y F. Ovejero (comp.), Razones para el socialismo. Barcelona: Paidós, pp. 11-62.
HABERMAS, J. (2001), Facticidad y validez. Sobre el derecho y el Estado democrático de derecho en términos de teoría del discurso. Madrid: Trotta.
HANDLER, J. F. (2004), Social citizenship and workfare in the United States and Western Europe: the paradox of inclusion. Cambridge y Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
HELD, D. (1991), “Between State and Civil Society: Citizenship”, en Andrews, G. (ed.) (1991), Citizenship. Londres: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 19-25.
-------(1997), “Ciudadanía y autonomía”, en La Política. Revista de estudios sobre el Estado y la sociedad núm. 3, pp. 41-68.
-------(2001), Modelos de Democracia. Madrid: Alianza.
KYMLICKA, W. y W. Norman (1997), “El retorno del ciudadano. Una revisión de la producción reciente en teoría de la ciudadanía”, en La Política. Revista de estudios sobre el Estado y la sociedad, núm. 3, pp. 5-40.
LEVITAS, R. (1986): The Ideology of the New Right. Cambridge: Polity Press.
MARSHALL, T. H. (1965), “The Right to Welfare”, en Marshall, T. H. (1981): The Right to Welfare and other Essays. Londres: Heineman, pp. 83-94.
-------(1969), “Reflections on Power”, en Marshall, T. H. (1981): The Right to Welfare and other Essays. Londres: Heineman, pp.137-153.
MARSHALL, T. H. y T. Bottomore (1998), Ciudadanía y Clase Social. Madrid: Alianza.
MEAD, L. (1986), Beyond Entitlement: The Social Obligations of Citizenship. Nueva York: Free Press.
MOUFFE, C. (1999), El retorno de lo político. Comunidad, ciudadanía, pluralismo, democracia radical. Barcelona: Paidós.
OVEJERO, F. (1997), “Tres ciudadanos y el bienestar”, en La Política. Revista de estudios sobre el Estado y la sociedad, núm. 3 pp. 393-116.
PEÑA, J. (2000), La ciudadanía hoy: Problemas y propuestas. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
POWELL, M. (2002), “The Hidden History of Social Rights”, en Citizensip Studies, vol. 6, núm 3, pp. 229-244.
PUTNAM, H. (2004), El desplome de la dicotomía hecho-valor y otros ensayos. Barcelona: Paidós.
REES, A. M. (1995), “The other T.H. Marshall”, en Journal of Social Policy núm. 24, pp. 341-361.
ROCHE, M. (1992), Rethinking Citizenship: Welfare, Ideology and Change in Modern Society. Londres: Polity Press.
ROSALES, J. M. (1998), Política cívica. La experiencia de la ciudadanía en la democracia liberal. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.
ROSANVALLON, P. (1995), La crisis del estado providencia. Madrid: Civitas.
SANMARTÍN MARROS, I. (2003), “La New Right en los años 80 y 90”, en Historia Actual, núm. 1, pp. 39-53.
SEN, A. (1976), Elección colectiva y bienestar social. Madrid: Alianza.
(1988), “¿Igualdad de qué?”, en Mcmurrin, S. M. (ed.), Libertad, Igualdad y Derecho. Las conferencias Tanner sobre filosofía moral. Barcelona: Ariel pp. 133-156. (1995), Nuevo examen de la desigualdad. Madrid: Alianza.
-------(1996), “Capacidad y Bienestar”, en Nussbaum, M. C. y Sen, A. (comp.), La Calidad de Vida. México: The United Nations University/Fondo de Cultura Económica, pp. 55-79.
-------(2000), Desarrollo y Libertad. Barcelona: Planeta. TWINE, F. (1994), Citizenship and Social Rights. The Interdependence of Self and Society. Londres: Sage.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
