Justice, Assistance or Charity? What Duties we have toward the World’s Poor? A Preliminary Exploration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v11i25.215Keywords:
Poverty, justice, assitance, perfect duties, agencyAbstract
In this article I intend to clarify the nature of our duties towards those people living in extreme poverty. Are they duties of justice? Are they duties of assistance? Are they mere charitable, supererogatory actions? I start by critically assessing some of the proposals available in the specialized literature and proceed to suggest three criteria that may orientate us when distributing responsibilities in general. From applying these criteria to the problem of extreme poverty I conclude that we all have duties of justice not to undermine the equal liberty of others to pursue their life plans, duties of justice to support just institutions and duties of assistance to aid those people facing extreme deprivation.
Downloads
References
Barry, C. (2005), “Applying the Contribution Principle”, en Andrew Kupper (ed.), Global Responsibilities, Londres: Routledge, pp. 135-152.
Chappell, T. (2003), “Integrity and the Demandingness”, en Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 10, núm. 3, Dordrecht: Springer, junio-julio, pp. 255-265.
Clapham, A. (2006), Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors, Oxford: Oxford University Press (OUP).
Cullity, G. (2004), The Moral Demands of Affluence, Oxford: OUP.
Cummiskey, D. (1996), Kantian Consequentialism, Oxford: OUP.
García Gibson, F. (2013), “Justicia global y deberes de rescate: ¿justicia o beneficencia?”, (manuscrito inédito).
Gilabert, P. (2013), From Global Poverty to Global Equality: A Philosophical Exploration, Oxford: OUP.
Guariglia, O. (2007), “Enforcing Economic and Social Human Rights”, en Thomas Pogge (ed.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right, Oxford: OUP, pp. 345-357.
Griffin, J. (2007), On Human Rights, Oxford: OUP.
Hill, T. (2002), Human Welfare and Moral Worth: Kantian Perspectives, Oxford: OUP.
____(1971), “Kant on Imperfect Duties and Supererogation”, Kant Studien, vol. 62, Halle: Kant-Gesellschaft, pp. 55-76.
Kant, I. (1998), Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres, Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
Kagan, S. (1989), The Limits of Morality, Oxford: Clarendon (OUP).
Meckled-García, S. (2013), “Giving Up the Goods: Rethinking the Human Right to Subsistence, Institutional Justice, and Imperfect Duties”, en Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 30, núm. 1, Aberdeen: Society for Applied Philosophy, febrero-abril, pp. 73-87.
____(2009), “Cómo no enfocar los derechos humanos y la justicia (global)”, en Julio Montero y Mariano Garreta Leclercq (eds.), Derechos humanos, justicia y democracia en un mundo transnacional, Buenos Aires: Prometeo, pp. 85-100.
Miller, D. (2007), National Responsibility and Global Justice, Oxford: OUP.
Murphy, L. (2003), “The Demands of Beneficence”, en Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 22, núm. 4, octubre-diciembre, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (PU), pp. 267-292.
____(2000), Moral Demands in Non-Ideal Theory, Oxford: OUP.
Nagel, T. (2005), “The Problem of Global Justice”, en Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 33, núm. 2, marzo-mayo, Princeton, Nueva Jersey: PUP, pp. 113-147.
Nozick, R. (1974), Anarchy, State and Utopia, Nueva Jersey: Prentice Hall.
O’Neill, O. (2005), “Agents of Justice”, en Andrew Kupper (ed.), Global Responsibilities, Londres: Routledge, pp. 37-52.
____(1996), Towards Justice and Virtue. A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning, Cambridge, Reino Unido-Nueva York: Cambridge University Press (CUP).
Orend, B. (2002), Human Rights: Concept and Context, Orchard Park, NY- Lancashire, Reino Unido: Broadview Press.
Pogge, T. (2009), Hacer justicia a la humanidad, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica (FCE).
Rawls, J. (1999), A Theory of Justice, edición revisada, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Ripstein, A. (2009), Force and Freedom. Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Cambridge, Massachusetts-Londres: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2004), “Elements of a Theory of Human Rights”, en Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 32, núm. 4, octubre-diciembre, Princeton, Nueva Jersey: PUP, pp. 315-356.
Shue, H. (1996), Basic Rights. Subsistence, Affluence, and us Foreign Policy, Princeton, Nueva Jersey: PUP.
Singer, P. (1972), “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, en Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 1, núm. 3, primavera, Princeton, Nueva Jersey: PUP, pp. 229-243.
Thomson, J. J. (1971), “A Defense of Abortion”, en Philsophy and Public Affairs, vol. 1, núm. 1, otoño, Princeton, Nueva Jersey: PUP, pp. 69-80.
Valentini, L. (2009), Justice and Assistance: Three Approaches and a Fourth One, Oxford: Centre for the Study of Social Justice (CSSJ)-University of Oxford, Working Papers Series sj009, enero. Disponible en línea en http://social-justice.politics.ox.ac.uk. 1de noviembre de 2013.
Wenar, L. (2007), “Responsibility and Severe Poverty”, en Thomas Pogge (ed.), Freedom from Poverty as a Human Right, Oxford: OUP, pp. 255-274.
Williams, B. (1981), Moral Luck. Philosophical Papers 1973-1980, Cambridge, Reino Unido: CUP.
Young, I. M. (2006), “Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model”, en Social Philosophy and Social Policy, vol. 23, núm. 1, enero-junio, Bowling Green, oh-Cambridge, Reino Unido: Social Philosophy and Policy Foundation/cup, pp. 102-130.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.