WITTGENSTEIN’S RELEVANCE FOR THE POLITICAL THOUGHT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v0i1.57Keywords:
Juegos de lenguaje, formas de vida, reglas gramaticales, comunidades de certezaAbstract
Without having tried to sketch an exhaustive review of the Witt- gensteinian outlook, I try to demonstrate that, precisely because of its remarkable therapeutic character, it has a profound practical relevance as well. I hold that the Wittgensteinian conception of philosophical thinking can provide a new path to think about the realm of the public. More so, its invitation to watch carefully contains a strong liberating impulse.
Downloads
References
BALL, T., J. Farr y R. L. Hanson (eds.) (1989) Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
CONNOLLY, William E. (1993) The Terms of Political Discourse [1a. ed. 1974]. Princeton, Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.
CRARY, Alice. (2000) “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy in relation to political thought” en Alice Crary y Rupert Read (eds.), The new Wittgenstein. Nueva York: Routledge, pp. 118-145.
EASTON, Susan M. (1983) Humanist Marxism and Wittgensteinian Social Philosophy. FANN, K. T. (1992) El concepto de filosofía en Wittgenstein. Madrid: Tecnos. GALLIE, W. B. (1956) Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, en New Series, vol.
LVI, 1955. Traducido como “Conceptos esencialmente impugnados” por Gustavo Ruiz Millán en Cuadernos de Crítica, núm. 49. México: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la UNAM, 1998.
GELLNER. (1959) Words and Things: An Examination of, and an Attack on, Linguistic Philosophy. Londres: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. (1990) Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge: Polity.
______, (1993) La lógica de las ciencias socials. México: REI. JANIK, Allan. (1989) Style, Politics and The future of Philosophy. Dordrecht (Holanda): Kluwer Academic Publishers. KRIPKE, O. S. (1989) Wittgenstein. Reglas y lenguaje privado [1a. ed. ing. 1982].
México: UNAM. LAFONT, Cristina. (1993) La razón como lenguaje. Una revisión del “giro lingüístico”
en la filosofía del lenguaje alemana. Madrid: Visor.
MCDOWELL, John. (1998) “Meaning and Intentionality in Wittgenstein ́s Later Philosophy” en Mind, Value and Reality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp. 277-278.
MONK, Ray. (1994) Ludwig Wittgenstein [ed. orig. 1990]. Barcelona: Anagrama.
MOUFFE, Chantal. “Wittgenstein, Political Theory and Democracy” en www.polylog.org/them70102/asp01-en.htm.
MUÑOZ, María Teresa. (2000) “El desafío del multiculturalismo” en Theoría, núms. 9 y 10. México: Colegio de Filosofía de la UNAM.
______, (2001) “Nominalismo epistemológico y relativismo cultural. Acerca de la posibilidad de dar razones” en Signos Filosóficos, núm. 5. México, enero-julio.
______, (2004) “El discurso político. Notas para un acercamiento wittgensteiniano” en Signos Filosóficos. En prensa. NYÍRI. (1982) “Wittgenstein ́s Later Work in Relation to Conservatism” in B. F.
McGuinnes, Wittgenstein and His Times. Chicago. PITKIN, Hanna. (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA y Londres: University of California Press.
______, (1972) Wittgenstein and Justice: On the Significance of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Social and Political Thought. Berkeley: University California Press.
______, (1984) Wittgenstein: el lenguaje, la política y la justicia. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
PLEASANTS, Nigel. (2000) “Winch and Wittgenstein on Understanding Ourselves Critically: Descriptive not Metaphysical” en Inquiry 43 (3), 289-318.
RORTY, Richard. (1993) “Wittgenstein, Heidegger y la reificación del lenguaje” en Ensayos sobre Heidegger y otros pensadores contemporáneos [1a. ed. ing. 1991]. Barcelona: Paidós, pp. 79-99.
______, (1995) La filosofía y el espejo de la naturaleza [1a. ed. ing. 1979]. Madrid: Cátedra.
RUBINSTEIN, David. (1981) Marx and Wittgenstein. Social Praxis and Social Explanation. Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
SKINNER, Quentin. (1989) “Language and political change” en Terence Ball, James Farr and Russell L. Hanson, Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
______, (1993) Los fundamentos del pensamiento político moderno [1a. ed. ing. 1978]. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
STANLEY, Cavell. (1999) The Claim of Reason [1a. ed. 1979]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TOMASINI , Alejandro. (1994) Lenguaje y Anti-metafísica. Cavilaciones wittgensteinianas. México: Interlínea.
TULLY, James. (1989) “Wittgenstein and Political Philosophy” in Political Theory, 17.2, 172.
VELASCO, Ambrosio. (1995) Teoría política: filosofía e historia, ¿anacronismos y anticuarios? México: UNAM.
WELLMER, Albercht. (1996) Finales de partida: la modernidad irreconciliable, Madrid, Cátedra, [1a ed. en Alemán 1993], p. 264.
WINCH, Peter. (1958) The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. [1a. ed. en castellano en Buenos Aires, Amorrortu, 1972].
______. (1990) Ciencia social y filosofía. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu. ______. (1994) Comprender una sociedad primitiva. Barcelona: Paidós.
WITTGENSTEIN, Ludwig. (1985), Investigaciones Filosóficas. Barcelona: Crítica Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas de la UNAM.
______. (1987) Observaciones sobre los fundamentos de las matemáticas, trad. de Isidoro Reguera. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.
______. (1989a) Cuadernos azul y marrón. Madrid: Tecnos.
______: (1989b) Sobre la certeza. Barcelona: Gedisa.
WRIGTH, Crispin. (1992) Truth and Objectivity. Mass.: Harvard University Press.
______. (1989) “Critical Notice of Colin McGinn: Wittgenstein on Meaning”, Mind, 98, 289-305.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
