Caso “Gelman vs Uruguay”: una revisión bajo la idea de Razón Pública de John Rawls
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v17i42.739Keywords:
Razón pública, legitimidad democrática, caso Gelman vs Uruguay, Rawls, tribunales,Abstract
Aquí se desarrollará una crítica a la resolución de la Corte IDH, referente al Caso Gelman vs Uruguay, desde la concepción de “razón pública” de John Rawls, así como su extensión al uso de este por parte de los Tribunales. Lo anterior pretende poner de manifiesto, las “tensiones democráticas” que se hacen presentes en esta sentencia si se le mira bajo una concepción de legitimidad. En este sentido, el texto examina la decisión de la Corte respecto a la Ley de Caducidad uruguaya puesto que, en ella, se termina por declarar inválida una norma que, a pesar de ser polémica, pareciera fungir como una manifestación del “Pueblo Uruguayo” legítima en términos democráticos y constitucionales.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
