THE SELF-REFLEXIVE REASON AS A PRINCIPLE OF THE PHILOSOPHY OF HEGEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v8i15.88Keywords:
Hegel, reason, logic, selfreflexivity, basisAbstract
To Hegel the self-reflexivity of the reason is one of the principles of philosophy; it’s what mainly determinates the rational thinking, and it’s constitutive of the philosophic thinking for itself. It is worth noting the need of the self-reflection of the reason as the foundation of Hegel’s philosophic systematization, and, according to him, there would not be any philosophic reflection without it. The article approaches: 1) The relationship between the reality and the need of the self-reflective reason with the concept and function of the human thinking in general, and with the philosophic thinking as logical thinking; 2) its relationship with the problem of the philosophic determination of the “philosophical science” concept with the philosophical knowledge in general, and with the method; and 3) finally, it provides some elements about the relevance of the reason upon which is based the present.
Downloads
References
APEL, K.-O. (1975), “El problema de la fundamentación última a la luz de una pragmática trascendental del lenguaje. Ensayo de una metacrítica del ‘racionalismo crítico’”, en Diánoia, año XXI, núm. 21, México: UNAM, pp. 140-173.
__________ (1986a), “El problema de una teoría filosófica de los tipos de racionalidad”, en Estudios éticos, Barcelona: Alfa, pp. 11-28.
__________ (1986b), “Necesidad, dificultad y posibilidad de una fun- damentación filosófica de la ética”, en Estudios éticos, Barcelona: Alfa, pp. 105-173.
FICHTE, J. G. (2005) [1794], Über den Begriff der Wissenschaftslehre, Sttutgart: Reclam.
GUYER, P. (1993), “Thought and Being: Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Theoretical Philosophy”, en Frederick C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge-Nueva York: Cam- bridge University Press, pp. 171-210.
HÖSLE, V. (1988), Hegels System, Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
__________ (1995), “Grösse und Grenzen von Kants praktischer Phi- losophie”, en Praktische Philosophie in der modernen Welt, Munich: Beck, pp. 15-45.
__________ (1996), Philosophiegeschichte und objektiver Idealismus, Munich:
Beck. HYLTON, P. (1993), “Hegel and analytic philosophy”, en Frederick C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge- Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 445-485.
KESSELRING, T. (1984), Die Produktivität der Antinomie, Francfort: Suhrkamp.
KUHLMANN, W. (2007), “Begründung”, en Beiträge zur Diskursethik. Studien zur Traszendentalpragmatik, Würzburg: Königshausen & Neuman, pp. 65-74.
LAUER, Q. (1971), Hegel’s Idea of Philosophy, Nueva York: Fordham University Press.
MIRANDA, J. P. (1983), Apelo a la razón. Teoría de la ciencia y crítica del positivismo, México: Premiá.
__________ (1989), Hegel tenía razón. El mito de la ciencia empírica, México: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM)-Iztapalapa.
ROJAS, M. (2002), Der Begriff des Logischen und die Notwendigkeit universell-substantieller Vernunft, Aachen-Mainz: Wissen schaftsverlag.
__________ (Inédito), La razón ético-objetiva y los problemas morales del presente, (de próxima aparición).
SCHNÄDELBACH, H. (2000), “Philosophie als spekulative Wissenschaft”, en Hans Schnädelbach, et.al., Hegels “Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften” (1830), Francfort: Suhrkamp, pp. 21-86.
STACE, W. T. (1955), The Philosophy of Hegel. A Systematic Exposition, Nueva York: Dover.
VIEWEG, K. (2006), “Freiheit und Weisheit: Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes als ‘sich vollbringender Skeptizismus’”, en Apuntes Fi- losóficos, vol. 15, núm. 29, febrero, Caracas: Escuela de Filosofía- Universidad Central de Venezuela, pp. 277-301.
WANDSCHNEIDER, D. (1994), “Letztbegründung und Logik”, en Hans- Dieter Klein (ed.), Studiem zum System der Philosophie. Band 2: Letztbegründung als System?, Bonn: Bouvier, pp. 84-103.
__________ (1995a), Grundzüge einer Theorie der Dialektik, Stuttgart: Klett- Cotta.
__________ (1995b), “G. W. F. Hegel: Philosophie als strenge Wi- ssenschaft”, en Karl-Siegbert Rehberg, Frank-Rutger Hausmann (eds.), Klassiker der Wissenschaften, Aachen: RWTH University, pp. 263-275.
WARTENBERG, T. E. (1993), “Hegel’s Idealism: The logic of Con- ceptuality”, en Frederick C. Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel, Cambridge-Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102-129.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
