On the Contemporary Ethical-Political Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v11i24.230Keywords:
Antigone, Community, Movement, Action, Insurmountable ParadoxAbstract
Is the disagreement between human and divine law, derived from “judgment”, what lends continuity to the ethical-political community over time? Does the collusion between judgment and guilt protect power in its finitude in the territory of practical life? And in this respect, is it in the incessant movement of contradiction that the insuperable paradox that its re-configuration lies in the perversion of the confinement of the community is revealed? Through these questions, this essay seeks to trace the limits of the speculative discourse in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit in order to rethink the contemporary ethicalpolitical community.
Downloads
References
Adorno, T., y Horkheimer, M. (2002), Dialectic of Enlightenment, Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, G. (2003), La comunidad que viene, Valencia: Pretextos.
Barnett, S. (1998), “Introduction: Hegel Before Derrida”, en Stuart
Barnett (ed.), Hegel After Derrida, Nueva York: Routledge.
Bataille, G. (1961), Le coupable. Suivi de Làlleluiah, París: L’imaginaire-Gallimard.
_________ (2001), Lo imposible, Madrid: Arena Libros.
Benhabib, S. (2004), Los derechos de los otros. Extranjeros, residentes y ciudadanos, Barcelona: Gedisa.
_________ (1996), The Reluctant Modernismo of Hannah Arendt, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
_________ (1992), “Judgment and the Moral Foundations of Politics in Hannah Arendt’s Thought”, en Situating the Self. Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, Nueva York: Routledge.
Blanchot, M. (2002), La comunidad inconfesable, Madrid: Arena Libros.
Bloch, E. (1983), Sujeto-objeto: el pensamiento de Hegel, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Butler, J., Laclau, E. y Žižek, S. (2000), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left, Londres: Verso.
Christopher M. F. (1989), Sartre and Hegel: The Variations of an Enigma in “L’étre et le Néant”, Bonn: Bouvier.
Derrida, J. (2001a), Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, Nueva York: Routledge.
_________ (2001b), Writing and Difference, Londres: Routledge.
_________ (2000), La hospitalidad, Buenos Aires: Ediciones la Flor.
_________ (1998), Políticas de la amistad, Valladolid: Editorial Trotta.
Esposito, R. (2003), Communitas: origen y destino de la comunidad, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Gadamer, H. (2005), La dialéctica de Hegel. Cinco ensayos hermenéuticos, Madrid: Cátedra Teorema.
George, T. D. (2006), Tragedies of Spirit. Tracing Finitude in Hegel’s Phenomenology, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Hartmann, K. (1989), Sartre’s ontology: a study of “Being and Nothingness” in the light of Hegel’s Logic, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Habermas, J. (2000), Teoría y praxis. Estudios de Filosofía social, Madrid: Tecnos.
Hegel, G.W.F. (1985), Fenomenología del espíritu, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
_________ (1982), Ciencia de la Lógica, Buenos Aires: Ediciones Solar.
Heidegger, M. (2013), Ser y tiempo. Libro en línea disponible en http://espanol.free-ebooks.net/ebook/Ser-y-el-Tiempo/pdf?dl&preview, Consultado el 28 de octubre de 2013.
_________ (2008), Basic Writings, Nueva York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought.
_________ (1992), La fenomenología del espíritu de Hegel, Madrid: Editorial Alianza.
_________ (1988), Identidad y Diferencia, Barcelona: Anthropos.
Klenner, A. (2000), Esbozo del concepto de libertad: filosofía del derecho de Hegel, Santiago de Chile: LOM.
Kojéve, A. (1969), Lectures on Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Nueva York: Basic Books.
Levinas, E. (2000), Ética e infinito, Madrid: La balsa de la medusa.
_________ (1999), Totalidad e infinito, Salamanca: Sígueme.
_________ (1998), De otro modo que ser o más allá de la esencia, Salamanca: Sígueme.
Madison, G. (1988), Hermenéutica de la postmodernidad, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Marcuse, H. (1954), Reason and Revolution. Hegel and the Rise of Social Theory, Nueva York: Humanities Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962), Phenomenology of Perception, Nueva York: Routledge.
Mondolfo, R. (1982), “Prólogo” en Ciencia de la Lógica, de G. W. F. Hegel, Buenos Aires: Ediciones Solar.
Nancy, J. (2006), Ser singular plural, Madrid: Arena Libros.
_________ (2000a), La communauté desouevrée, Madrid: Arena Libros.
_________ (2000b), La comunidad inoperante, Santiago de Chile: LOM Ediciones.
Nietzsche, F. (1990), Ecce Hommo, París: Gallimard.
Patocka, P. J. (1973), Platon et l’Europe, Lagrasse: Verdier.
Sófocles (2000), “Antígona”, en Tragedias, Madrid: Biblioteca Básica Gredos.
Weil, E. (1950), Hegel et L’Etat, París: Vrin.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
