Justicia distributiva y reconocimiento. Una expansión de la propuesta de Honneth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29092/uacm.v8i17.451Keywords:
Justice, recognition, distribution, capabilities, vulnerabilityAbstract
Axel Honneth’s normative model of recognition has had growing influence in contemporary discussions. The theoretical scope of his proposal is wide enough to integrate questions of distributive justice; however, the treatment that Honneth gives to those questions is not intensive enough as he does not consider, among other things, the problem of the informational basis. On the other hand, Amartya Sen’s capabilities approach has some points in contact with Honneth’s proposal, which would enable the informational basis of the capabilities approach to be incorporated into a new proposal that would have the autonomy of reciprocal recognition as its background. These coincidences would allow for the solution to some of the difficulties and weaknesses that Sen’s programme, as well as Honneth’s one has, by means of a programme of distributive justice that incorporates both.
Downloads
References
Anderson, J., Honneth, A. (2005), “Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition and Justice”, en John Christman, Joel Anderson (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127-149.
Bauman, Z. (2007), Consuming Life, Cambridge: Polity Press. Barber, B. (2007), Consumed, Nueva York: Norton.
Cohen, G. A. (1989), “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”, en Ethics, vol. 99, núm. 4, julio, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 906-944.
Conill, J. (2004), Horizontes de economía ética, Madrid: Tecnos.
Cortina, A. (2002), Por una ética del consumo, Madrid: Taurus.
Daniels, N. (1990), “Equality of What: Welfare, Resources, or Capabilities”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 50, Suplemento, otoño, Rhode Island: International Phenomenological Society/Brown University, pp. 273-296.
Dworkin, R. (1981), “What Is Equality? Part ii: Equality of Resources”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 10, núm. 4, otoño, Princeton, nj: Princeton University Press, pp. 283-345.
__________ (2000), Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Forst, R. (2002), Contexts of Justice, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gibbard, A., Varian, H. (1978), “Economic Models”, en The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 75, núm. 11, noviembre, Nueva York: The Journal of Philosophy Inc., pp. 664-677.
Habermas, J. (1987), Teoría de la acción comunicativa ii. Crítica de la razón funcionalista, Madrid: Taurus, 1987.
Honneth, A. (1997), La lucha por el reconocimiento, Barcelona: Crítica / Grijalbo/Mondadori.
__________ (1991), “La ética discursiva y su concepto implícito de justicia. Una observación para la discusión”, en Karl-Otto Apel, Adela Cortina, Julio De Zan y Dorando Michelini (eds.), Ética comunicativa y democracia, Barcelona: Crítica, pp. 164-174.
Le Grand, J. (2003), Motivation, Agency and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens, Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Nozick, R. (1988), Anarquía, Estado y utopía, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica (FCE).
Nussbaum, M. (2000), Women and Human Development, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Pereira G. (2009), “Preferencias adaptativas: un desafío para el diseño de las políticas sociales”, en Adela Cortina y Gustavo Pereira, Pobreza y libertad. Erradicar la pobreza desde el enfoque de Amartya Sen, Madrid: Tecnos, pp. 57-76.
__________ (2007), ¿Condenados a la desigualdad extrema? Un programa de justicia distributiva para conjurar un destino de Morlocks y Eloi, México: Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos y Sociales (CEFPS) Vicente Lombardo Toledano.
__________ (2004), Medios, capacidades y justicia distributiva, México: UNAM.
Rawls, J. (1979), Teoría de la Justicia, México: FCE.
__________ (1986), “Unidad social y bienes primarios”, en Justicia como equidad, Madrid: Tecnos, pp. 187-211.
__________ (1996), El liberalismo político, Barcelona: Crítica.
__________ (2002), La justicia como equidad. Una reformulación, Barcelona: Paidós.
Robeyns, I. (2003), “Is Nancy Fraser’s Critique of Theories of Distributive Justice Justified?”, en Constellations, vol. 10, núm. 4, diciembre, pp. 538-554.
Roemer, J. E. (1986), “Equality of Resources Implies Equality of Welfare”, en Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101, núm. 4, noviembre, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 751-784.
Sandel, M. (2000), El liberalismo y los límites de la justicia, Barcelona: Gedisa.
Sen, A. (2009), The Idea of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
__________ (1999), Development as Freedom, Nueva York: Alfred A. Knopf.
__________ (1995) [1992], Nuevo examen de la desigualdad, Madrid: Alianza.
__________ (1994) [1987], “¿Igualdad de qué?”, en Libertad, igualdad y derecho, Barcelona: Planeta-Agostini, pp. 133-156.
__________ (1979), “Utilitarianism and Welfarism”, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 76, núm. 9, septiembre, Nueva York: The Journal of Philosophy Inc., pp. 463-489.
Walzer, M. (1993), Las esferas de la justicia. Una defensa del pluralismo y la igualdad, México: FCE.
Young, I. M. (1999), “Justice, Inclusion, and Deliberative Democracy”, en Stephen Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, Nueva York: Oxford University Press, pp. 151-158.
Published
Issue
Section
License
This Journal is licensed under Creative Commons Mexico 2.5. It is allowed to reproduce and disseminate the contents of the Journal for educational or research purposes, not for profit, as long as they are not mutilated and cite the source (Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social) and the author.
The copyright of the articles published in Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social are transferred by the author(s) to Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México when the originals have been accepted, so that they are published and distributed both in the printed and electronic versions of the Journal. However, as established by law, the author(s) retains their moral rights. The author(s) will receive a form of assignment of copyright that they must to sign when their original has been accepted. In the case of collective articles, the signature of one of the authors will suffice, provided that the latter has obtained the consent of the others.
Authors may use the material of their article in other works or books published by themselves, with the condition of quoting Andamios as the original source of the texts.
The articles contained in this publication are the responsibility of their authors and do not compromise the official position of Andamios, Revista de Investigación Social of the Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México.
